Quote:
Originally Posted by iagainsti
I read in MD magazine about a year long study where a group of men were adminstered test-c subcutanously and measured through out the year against a control group given the same amount but intramuscularly. All blood levels were the same between both groups at all points. If you miss the muscle, the goods should still get there just the same.
|
I remember that study and have often wondered about the benefits or lack of sub-q Test injections.
My biggest concern is that aromatase is already in your fat layers and injecting test directly into that fat layer thereby exposing it again in a direct fashion to aromatase must surely raise your estrogen levels higher compared to an IM injection. This then would lead I am guessing to an almost necessity to use an AI on cycle and we now how that can affect gains. Your also injecting oil into fat here too. Abscesses would seemingly be a bigger concern as well injecting oil into fat as this would IMO not disperse too well.